Liquidation Preferences: What the Expert360 Sale Teaches Australian Founders

Liquidation Preferences: What the Expert360 Sale Teaches Australian Founders

Expert360 raised around $30 million and sold for a reported $16 million, with nothing left for ordinary shareholders. Here’s how liquidation preferences stack up round by round, and what to model before you sign your next term sheet.

Jump to...

Facebook
Tweet
LinkedIn
Expert360 raised around $30 million and sold for a reported $16 million, with nothing left for ordinary shareholders. Here’s how liquidation preferences stack up round by round, and what to model before you sign your next term sheet.

Expert360, the Sydney consulting marketplace founded in 2013, has been sold to AI job-matching platform Swipejobs for a reported $16 million. The company had raised around $30 million over its life. Under the sale’s terms, only holders of Series C and C1 preference shares receive anything. The founder, the early investors and the employees holding equity receive nothing. (SmartCompany, Startup Daily)

This isn’t a story about predatory investors. Several of the venture funds that backed earlier rounds are also reported to walk away with nothing, through exactly the same mechanism. It isn’t a story about a founder who didn’t work hard enough either. More than a decade went into the business, and it was one of the standout Australian startups of the 2010s. The founder put it plainly herself: “Founders are paid last. That’s the deal you sign, and I’d sign it again.”

What it does show is how liquidation preferences work once several rounds are stacked on top of each other, and how rarely founders model that before they sign. In this article, we explain what a liquidation preference is, how the preference stack builds up round by round, the number every founder should be able to quote before signing a term sheet, and the terms worth looking at closely while you still have room to negotiate them.

What a liquidation preference does

A liquidation preference is the right to get your money back first when the company is sold or wound up, ahead of ordinary shareholders. Investors usually get it by buying preference shares rather than ordinary shares.

The most common form is a 1x non-participating preference. When the company is sold, the investor chooses whichever is worth more: their original investment back, or converting to ordinary shares and taking their percentage of the sale price. If they put in $5 million for 20% and the company sells for $100 million, they convert and take $20 million. If it sells for $15 million, they take their $5 million back instead of the $3 million their 20% would be worth.

On its own, that’s a reasonable term. The investor is taking risk on a business with no certain outcome and wants protection if things go sideways. It’s market standard for good reason.

How the preference stack builds up

A single 1x preference rarely causes a problem. The trouble starts when every round adds another one on top.

Each round you raise adds another layer of money that has to be repaid before ordinary shares are worth anything. That total is your preference stack. How it pays out depends on how the rounds rank against each other:

  • Stacked (senior) preferences. The newest round is repaid first, then the round before it, and so on down. This is common in later rounds, and it’s the structure that left Expert360’s earlier investors with nothing.
  • Equal ranking (pari passu). All preference holders share whatever is available in proportion to what they’re owed. Everyone takes a haircut, but no round is wiped out completely while another is paid in full.

Here’s how that plays out. Say a startup raised a $3 million seed round, an $8 million Series A and a $20 million Series B, all with 1x non-participating preferences – $31 million in total. It sells for $25 million.

With stacked preferences, Series B takes its $20 million, Series A gets the remaining $5 million, and the seed investors, founders and option holders get nothing. If all three rounds rank equally instead, each investor recovers about 81 cents in the dollar. The founders and the team still get nothing in both cases, because the sale price never gets past the $31 million stack.

That’s the Expert360 picture. A sale price of $16 million against around $30 million raised runs out well before it reaches the ordinary shares. The waterfall wasn’t set in the sale negotiation. It was built years earlier, one term sheet at a time.

The number every founder should be able to quote

There’s one question worth answering before you sign any term sheet: what does the company have to sell for before your ordinary shares are worth anything?

That number moves every time you raise. A $5 million round at a strong valuation feels like a win on the day it closes. It also raises the sale price your exit has to clear by at least $5 million, and by more if the preference is participating or carries a multiple.

Most founders can tell you their last valuation without looking it up. Very few can tell you this number, and it’s the one that decides what they walk away with in anything short of a big exit. Our free cap table template for startups is a good place to start pulling your rounds together.

The terms worth looking at before you sign

None of these are unusual requests. They’re the questions an experienced adviser asks at every round, and they’re far easier to shape at term sheet stage than at exit.

  • Model the waterfall at every term sheet, not at exit. Look at what each shareholder receives if the company sells for half the post-money valuation, at the post-money valuation and at three times it. The upside case looks fine under almost any structure, which is why it’s the one founders tend to look at. The downside cases are the ones that show you what the terms really mean.
  • Treat valuation and terms as one negotiation. A higher headline valuation with a 2x participating preference can leave you worse off than a lower valuation on a clean 1x non-participating preference. Investors will often agree to the valuation you want in exchange for the structure they want, so be clear on what you’re trading.
  • Ask where the new money ranks. Will the new round sit senior to existing preference shares, or rank equally with them? Stacked seniority is what turns a modest exit into nothing at all for everyone below the top layer.
  • Agree what your team gets in a downside sale early. Option holders sit at the very back of the queue. In a sale like Expert360’s, they get the same as the founders – nothing – often after taking a lower salary for years on the strength of that equity. If you want your team to see something from a modest sale, a management incentive or transaction bonus pool has to be agreed while you still have leverage, not once a buyer is at the table.
  • Raise what you need rather than the most you can. Every dollar of preference is a dollar ahead of you in a modest exit. When the realistic outcome is a trade sale rather than an IPO, that trade-off matters.
  • Read the drag-along clause. A drag-along lets a set majority of shareholders force everyone else to accept a sale, including a sale that pays you nothing. Understand the threshold and who controls it when you sign, not when the notice arrives.

If you’d like more on the wider picture, we cover how debt, preference shares and ordinary equity fit together in What Is a Capital Stack? How Aussie Startups Should Think About Funding Structure, and the record-keeping side in The Cap Table Mistakes That Come Back to Haunt You.

Why this matters more in the current market

For a lot of good Australian startups right now, the realistic exit is a trade sale at a price that might have looked disappointing a few years ago, rather than a float or a headline acquisition. That’s the scenario your preference stack needs to hold up in, not the one on the vision slide of your pitch deck.

None of this is an argument against raising. It’s an argument for knowing, at every round, exactly what you’re agreeing to and what it costs you at the exit values that are actually likely. That means knowing what sits on your share register, in what order it gets paid, and what the company has to sell for before your shares and your team’s options are worth anything. Those numbers change with every round you close, so they’re worth keeping current as you raise, and essential once an exit is on the table.

It’s a modelling exercise, and one our fractional CFO team works through with founders alongside our cap table management services.

Know your preference stack before your next raise

If you can’t say today what your company would need to sell for before your shares are worth anything, that’s much easier to fix before your next round than after it. We model preference stacks and exit waterfalls with founders regularly, from the first priced round through to a sale process. Book a free call with Standard Ledger and we’ll help you map it out.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal or tax advice. Term sheet and shareholder agreement terms vary a lot between deals, so please speak with a qualified adviser (hey, that’s us!) before you sign.

Facebook
Tweet
LinkedIn
Remco Marcelis

Written by

Remco Marcelis

Co-founder & CEO, Standard Ledger

Remco Marcelis is co-founder and CEO of Standard Ledger, the accounting and CFO firm built specifically for startups and scale-ups. He has worked with startups and fast-growing SMEs as a CFO and virtual CFO for around 15 years, following four years as a venture capital fund investment manager and ten years in multinational consulting.

He is a chartered accountant with an advanced MBA from the University of Adelaide and a graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors. He writes here on fractional CFO work, financial modelling, capital raising and the financial decisions Australian founders face at each stage of growth.

FAQ

Questions founders ask us.

These are the things founders most often want to know before working with us. If your question isn't here, bring it along when you speak with us.

It means the investor gets the greater of their original investment back or their percentage share of the sale price, but not both. In a strong exit they convert to ordinary shares and take their share; in a weak one they take their money back first, ahead of ordinary shareholders. We explain how preferences fit alongside debt and ordinary equity in What Is a Capital Stack? How Aussie Startups Should Think About Funding Structure.

A non-participating preference gives the investor a choice between their money back or their share of the proceeds. A participating preference gives them both – their money back first, then their percentage of whatever is left. Participating preferences, and multiples above 1x, raise the sale price a company needs to reach before ordinary shareholders see any return.

No. Option holders sit at the back of the queue with ordinary shareholders, behind every class of preference share. In a sale below the total preference stack, their options can be worth nothing. If you want your team to receive something in a modest sale, a separate incentive pool needs to be agreed early, and it’s one of the points we cover in The Cap Table Mistakes That Come Back to Haunt You.

No. Seniority is negotiated each round. New money can be stacked senior to existing preference shares or rank equally with them (pari passu), and the difference can decide whether earlier investors recover part of their money or none of it. The ranking sits in your constitution and shareholders agreement, which is why keeping them in step with your register matters – something our cap table management services look after.

Yes. A fractional CFO can model what each shareholder receives at a range of sale prices under the terms you’re being offered, compare term sheets side by side, and show how a new round changes the price your exit needs to clear. It’s work our fractional CFO services do with founders before a raise and again when a sale is being explored.

Events coming up

[wfea layout="event" order_by="asc" newtab="true" organization_id="136577770604" status="live" readmore="false" thumb_original="true" venue_name="true" booknow_text="Book now" limit="2" no_events_found_text="We're not running any events at the moment."]

Join Our Free Startup Events

Empower Your Startup with Financial Knowledge

Looking to sharpen your financial skills or learn how to secure funding for your startup? Our in-person and online events are designed to empower founders like you with practical knowledge on topics like equity, valuations, tax incentives, and scaling strategies. Whether you’re preparing for an investor pitch or navigating complex financial models, we’ve got you covered.

Startup Tips & Insights: Take a Read

Without a board, nobody checks a self-funded founder's numbers. Here's when a bootstrapped business genuinely needs CFO support, the signals to watch for, and what the work looks like when you aren't raising.
A smaller business you own outright can leave you with more than a bigger one you own 42% of. Here's how to work out how large the funded path needs to get - preferences included - before it pays off.
Before you pick a number for your employee share scheme, you need to know whether you qualify for the startup tax concession. Here’s how the concession, the valuation methods and the timing fit together.
Buying the shares or buying the assets is one of the highest-value decisions in any acquisition. It shapes your tax bill, the liabilities you inherit and even the price. Here’s how the two structures compare.